Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to get rid of the ability to "forum store" by leaving out a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding cash or money equivalents from the "primary assets" formula. Additionally, any equity interest in an affiliate will be considered situated in the same area as the principal.
Normally, this testimony has been focused on questionable 3rd party release provisions implemented in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Kid Scouts of America, and many Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These arrangements frequently force financial institutions to release non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, although such releases are arguably not permitted, at least in some circuits, by the Insolvency Code.
In effort to stamp out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to limit "forum shopping" by forbiding entities from filing in any venue except where their business head office or primary physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare situated. Ostensibly, these costs would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other US districts, and guide cases far from the favored courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
In spite of their laudable function, these proposed modifications might have unanticipated and potentially negative effects when viewed from an international restructuring potential. While congressional testament and other analysts presume that venue reform would simply ensure that domestic business would submit in a various jurisdiction within the United States, it is a distinct possibility that international debtors might pass on the US Insolvency Courts entirely.
Without the factor to consider of money accounts as an opportunity towards eligibility, many foreign corporations without concrete possessions in the US may not qualify to submit a Chapter 11 personal bankruptcy in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do certify, worldwide debtors might not be able to count on access to the typical and hassle-free reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Offered the complex problems often at play in an international restructuring case, this might cause the debtor and financial institutions some uncertainty. This uncertainty, in turn, might encourage worldwide debtors to submit in their own nations, or in other more beneficial nations, rather. Especially, this proposed location reform comes at a time when many nations are imitating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which stressed liquidation, the brand-new Code's goal is to restructure and protect the entity as a going concern. Thus, financial obligation restructuring agreements might be authorized with as little as 30 percent approval from the overall financial obligation. Unlike the US, Italy's brand-new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by financial institutions.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of third celebration release arrangements. In Canada, businesses generally reorganize under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Business' Financial Institutions Plan Act (). Third party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring strategies.
The recent court choice explains, though, that regardless of the CBCA's more minimal nature, 3rd party release provisions might still be appropriate. For that reason, companies might still avail themselves of a less troublesome restructuring available under the CBCA, while still receiving the benefits of third celebration releases. Reliable since January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession procedure performed outside of formal insolvency proceedings.
Efficient as of January 1, 2021, Germany's brand-new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Framework for Organizations offers pre-insolvency restructuring procedures. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no option to reorganize their debts through the courts. Now, distressed companies can hire German courts to reorganize their financial obligations and otherwise preserve the going issue worth of their service by using much of the same tools offered in the US, such as maintaining control of their business, imposing stuff down restructuring plans, and executing collection moratoriums.
Inspired by Chapter 11 of the US Insolvency Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring process mainly in effort to help little and medium sized companies. While previous law was long slammed as too costly and too complex because of its "one size fits all" technique, this new legislation incorporates the debtor in possession model, and attends to a streamlined liquidation procedure when essential In June 2020, the United Kingdom enacted the Business Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA provides for a collection moratorium, revokes certain arrangements of pre-insolvency contracts, and permits entities to propose a plan with shareholders and creditors, all of which permits the development of a cram-down plan comparable to what might be achieved under Chapter 11 of the United States Insolvency Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Business (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), which made major legislative modifications to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has considerably boosted the restructuring tools readily available in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In Might of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which completely upgraded the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation seeks to incentivize additional financial investment in the country by offering greater certainty and performance to the restructuring procedure.
Offered these recent modifications, global debtors now have more alternatives than ever. Even without the proposed constraints on eligibility, foreign entities might less need to flock to the US as previously. Even more, should the United States' place laws be modified to prevent easy filings in specific practical and advantageous locations, global debtors might start to consider other areas.
Special thanks to Dallas partner Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles workplace.
Customer bankruptcy filings increased 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 consumer filings that month alone. Commercial filings jumped 49% year-over-year the highest January level because 2018. The numbers show what financial obligation professionals call "slow-burn monetary pressure" that's been constructing for many years. If you're having a hard time, you're not an outlier.
Preventing Aggressive Creditor Collector Harassment in 2026Consumer bankruptcy filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Business filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the greatest January industrial filing level since 2018. For all of 2025, consumer filings grew almost 14%.
Latest Posts
Eliminating Unfair Agency Harassment Practices in 2026
Key Tips for Seeking Credit Counseling in 2026
Ways to Save Your Property During Insolvency


